jump to navigation

undocumented minors in america August 15, 2019

Posted by Bradley in : ethics, Uncategorized , trackback

The 9th Circuit interpreted the settlement in  the Flores litigation to the effect that minors entitled under the settlement agreement to be held in safe and sanitary conditions have the right to “adequate sleep, essential hygiene items, and adequate, clean food and water” and that the district court’s decision that held this did not modify the safe and sanitary conditions provision of the settlement agreement. The safe and sanitary language was not too vague to be enforced. The court wrote:

Assuring that children eat enough edible food, drink clean water, are housed in hygienic facilities with sanitary bathrooms, have soap and toothpaste, and are not sleep-deprived are without doubt essential to the children’s safety. The district court properly construed the Agreement as requiring such conditions rather than allowing the government to decide whether to provide them.

It is shocking to think that the government argued that it was not necessary to provide incarcerated minors (children) with soap and water and ensure that they were not sleep deprived.

Comments»

no comments yet - be the first?